Which of the following describes a potential outcome of not regularly reviewing coding practices?

The outcome associated with not regularly reviewing coding practices leads to outdated practices that can cause coding inaccuracies. Regular reviews of coding practices ensure that coders are adhering to the most current guidelines and regulations, which is essential in maintaining high standards of accuracy.

When coding practices are left unchecked, they may not align with the evolving coding standards and regulations set by governing bodies. This misalignment can result in incorrect data being submitted for reimbursement, which can ultimately affect the financial health of healthcare organizations. Outdated practices may also lead to errors that could affect patient care quality, regulatory compliance, and overall reporting performance.

In contrast, the other options reflect outcomes that are the opposite of what happens when coding practices are not reviewed. Increased accuracy, compliance with the latest coding guidelines, and improved reimbursement rates are all benefits of regularly evaluating and updating coding practices, rather than a result of neglecting to do so. Regular reviews are critical to achieving these positive outcomes.